Hedging Impermanent Loss with Power Perpetuals (2)

PreviousHedging Impermanent Loss with Power Perpetuals (1)NextGamma Swap

Last updated 2 years ago

In the first article of this series, we explained how to hedge the impermanent loss of CFMM (of Uniswap V2 style) by power perpetuals. The idea is to hedge the Delta and Gamma to zero at the entry point (the price at which an LP deposits liquidity) so that the LP portfolio value stays flat in a reasonably wide range around the entry point. The algorithm was based on calculating the Delta and Gamma of an LP position of Uniswap-V2-style CFMM. Since the function in the CFMM of Uniswap V3 is different from that of V2, the hedging would be a bit different too. This article explains how to hedge the impermanent loss of LP position in Uniswap V3 by power perpetuals. We will skip the basic concepts (for which you can the details in the previous article) and directly start with Uniswap’s different Greek letters.

Greek Letters of Uniswap V3

Let’s still take the ETH-USDC pair as an example: provide $x_0$ ETH and $y_0$ SDC to Uniswap V3 when ETHUSDC= $p_0$ with the range specified as $(p_a,p_b)$ When the price of ETH $P$ changes within the range, you would have $x$ ETH and $y$ USDC following the formula:

\left(x+\frac{L}{\sqrt{p_b}}\right)\left(y+L\sqrt{p_a}\right)=L^2

Just like in Uniswap V2, $x$ and $y$ are functions of the ETH price $p$ (in this article we follow the denotation of Uniswap V3 whitepaper to use $p$ in place of $S$ and $L^2=K$ :

x=L\left(\frac{1}{\sqrt p}-\frac{1}{\sqrt p_b}\right)\\ y=L\left(\sqrt p-\sqrt p_a\right)

The value of your LP position is as follows, for $p\in(a,b)$ :

V=xp+y=L\left(2\sqrt p-\frac{p}{\sqrt p_b}-\sqrt p_a\right)

Therefore, we have Delta and the Gamma of your LP tokens as follows:

Hedging IL with Powers and Futures

Then we can rewrite the hedged portfolio as:

Numerical Analysis

Providing 1ETH+2000USDC to the ETH-USDC pair
Long 0.00253 units of ETH^2 (equals to 2.53 units of mETH^2 on Deri Protocol)

Cost vs Income

Constructing the portfolio above comes at a cost. Usually, both the futures and powers positions would incur funding fees. However, the expectation of the futures funding fee is 0. Therefore, we only consider the funding fee of the powers. Per the pricing of powers, the theoretical funding fee of 1 unit of powers for one funding period is:

This leads to an annualized cost in terms of a ratio of the LP value:

Let’s put this annualized cost into numerical scenarios:

Extra Capital for the Derivative Margin

The futures and powers positions require extra capital to be held as margin.

The power position needs:

Currently, Deri required 16% as initial margin for powers on BSC and 8% on Arbitrum, which correspond to 1635U on BSC and 817U on Arbitrum respectively.

Similarly the futures position needs:

Currently, Deri required 8% as initial margin for futures on BSC and 4% on Arbitrum, which correspond to 1754 U on BSC and 877 U on Arbitrum respectively.

Therefore, the total required margin would be 3389 U on BSC and 1678 U on Arbitrum. Please note that this initial margin is sufficient to cover the price change of +/-10%, so you don’t need to worry about liquidation.